Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
McDowell I 177
PutnamVsDavidson: when the cause-effect description is complete, then the sounds we utter, cannot be more than a mere "expression of our subjectivity".
RortyVsPutnam: Putnam understands by a "Declaration of X" still a synopsis, the synthesis of external and internal position.
Representatives of disquotation believe that people can only be described in behaviorist manner. But why should it be impossible to consider supplements by normative representations? (Putnam's philosophy was ultimately traditional).
McDowell I 177
Causality/Putnam: the desire to tell a story about the causal relationships of human pronouncements and environment, does not rule out that one invents a story, after the speakers expressing thoughts, and make assertions, and try to not make mistakes.
These stories are then eventually not distinguishable.

Pu I
H. Putnam
Von einem Realistischen Standpunkt Frankfurt 1993

H. Putnam
Repräsentation und Realität Frankfurt 1999

H. Putnam
Für eine Erneuerung der Philosophie Stuttgart 1997

H. Putnam
Pragmatismus Eine offene Frage Frankfurt 1995

Pu V
H. Putnam
Vernunft, Wahrheit und Geschichte Frankfurt 1990

J. McDowell
Geist und Welt Frankfurt 2001

> Counter arguments against Putnam

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-24