Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Truth value gaps, philosophy, logic: is an expression for the problem that occurs when a statement cannot be attributed to either of the two truth values "true" or "false". The reason for this may be that the statement is meaningless (not negatable), it refers to a future event or has a paradoxical formulation. See also truth values, truth value agglomerations, supervaluation, dialethism, paradoxes, future.

Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 157
Truth-value gaps / Wessel: if the object does not exist - Prior: "unstatable" third value - composite formulas: not discardable, because value can not be determined.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

We I
H. Wessel
Logik Berlin 1999

> Counter arguments against Wessel

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-07-23