Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Example for a non-truth-conditional semantics: conditional role semantics.

Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 50
Truth-conditional Semantics / Stalnaker: more than mere distinction between true and false sentences. - Practice of claiming. - Instead of an explanation of the reference -. therefore we need a notion of content. - Truth is not sufficient. - Content: more than ascription of truth values. - Communication, information. - Problem: if in an area all sentences are necessarily t / f, it is not clear how we should represent the content.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Sta I
R. Stalnaker
Ways a World may be Oxford New York 2003

> Counter arguments against Stalnaker

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-23