Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
Re III 40
T-Scheme/Tarski/Read: metaphysically neutral, not facts correlated with statements.
V 196
T-Schema/Liar-Paradox/Tarski/Sainsbury: the T-scheme allows the Liar paradox. - Because it does not initially distinguish between levels. - This shows that the daily language is not coherent.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.
Logic Texts
Me I Albert Menne Folgerichtig Denken Darmstadt 1988
HH II Hoyningen-Huene Formale Logik, Stuttgart 1998
Re III Stephen Read Philosophie der Logik Hamburg 1997
Sal IV Wesley C. Salmon Logik Stuttgart 1983
Sai V R.M.Sainsbury Paradoxien Stuttgart 2001

> Counter arguments in relation to Truth Definition

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-23