Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 148f
Truth Conditions/Dummett/Putnam: if one starts from the realism, neither Tarski's theory of truth nor Davidson's theory of meaning have any relevance for the truth of the metaphysical correspondence theory that requires that facts make sentences true. - Problem: how to understand one's own representations? - If there were "thought characters without language", then there must be an understanding a "detecting the truth conditions" before - that would be absurd. - Solution/Davidson: understanding the truth conditions is implicit knowledge of the language (a use of truth conditions as "good translation"). - If one understands "Snow is white", one knows what the case must be. - Then the truth conditions are the same in different languages. - Our use constitutes the truth conditions. - DummettVs: that is correct (a tautology), but no explanation.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Pu I
H. Putnam
Von einem Realistischen Standpunkt Frankfurt 1993

H. Putnam
Repräsentation und Realität Frankfurt 1999

H. Putnam
Für eine Erneuerung der Philosophie Stuttgart 1997

H. Putnam
Pragmatismus Eine offene Frage Frankfurt 1995

Pu V
H. Putnam
Vernunft, Wahrheit und Geschichte Frankfurt 1990

> Counter arguments against Putnam

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-23