Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
Dummett I 26f
Davidson/Dummett: we can do without a theory of the power of utterances. For him, it is unnecessary to describe or even mention the speech acts of assertion, questions, requests, etc. But Davidson presupposes that the concept of truth must already be understood. If we did not know anyting about it, except that it applies to the definition of truth for propositions of the language in question, we cannot know anything about the meaning of a sentence by specifying the truth conditions. Therefore, a prior understanding of the concept of truth is needed. - But not the conditions. For this knowledge will be determined by the theory of truth.

Davidson: one only needs to know the truth conditions (claiming power is superfluous).

_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

D I
D. Davidson
Der Mythos des Subjektiven Stuttgart 1993

D III
D. Davidson
Handlung und Ereignis Frankfurt 1990

D IV
D. Davidson
Wahrheit und Interpretation Frankfurt 1990

Du I
M. Dummett
Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie Frankfurt 1992

Du III
M. Dummett
Wahrheit Stuttgart 1982


> Counter arguments against Davidson



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-24