Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Understanding: the ability to give reasons for a distinction or to justify a selection of options. See also actions, meaning, knowledge.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
I 198 ff
Background: skills and knowledge that can make the consciousness work (e.g. understanding an image (uphill/downhill?) - the same real meaning determines in different backgrounds different fulfilment conditions - background: is not intention itself, "assume" has no explicit propositional content, not explicit belief (E.g. objects are fixed) - network: additional knowledge (cannot interpret itself) network intentional, no ability (even during sleep) ("Bush is president").
---
I 245
Simulation/understanding: simulation of a hurricane does not provide causal explanation, therefore also no understanding - similar pattern does not proof similar function.

_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

S I
J. R. Searle
Die Wiederentdeckung des Geistes Frankfurt 1996

S II
J.R. Searle
Intentionalität Frankfurt 1991

S III
J. R. Searle
Die Konstruktion der gesellschaftlichen Wirklichkeit Hamburg 1997

S IV
J.R. Searle
Ausdruck und Bedeutung Frankfurt 1982

S V
J. R. Searle
Sprechakte Frankfurt 1983


> Counter arguments against Searle
> Counter arguments in relation to Understanding



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-22