Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon:
Richard Rorty
VI 236
Reliability Theory/Rorty: danger of being restricted to occasional studies! It has not yet succeeded to scrap a justification process, maing it possible to compare good and bad scientists.
  The only question that arises in this area is how and why justification patterns change. This is no investigation of justification processes in relation to truthfulness.
  One should regard "true" as an adjective of approval,with Sellars and Brandom and not the description. ((s) contrary to Rorty, "Truth": property).

Ro I
R. Rorty
Der Spiegel der Natur Frankfurt 1997

Ro II
R. Rorty
Philosophie & die Zukunft Frankfurt 2000

Ro III
R. Rorty
Kontingenz, Ironie und Solidarität Frankfurt 1992

Ro IV
R. Rorty
Eine Kultur ohne Zentrum Stuttgart 1993

Ro V
R. Rorty
Solidarität oder Objektivität? Stuttgart 1998

Ro VI
R. Rorty
Wahrheit und Fortschritt Frankfurt 2000


> Counter arguments against Rorty
> Counter arguments in relation to Reliability Theory



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-24