Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
V 129
Variables/Quine: Their archetype are the pronouns -" in the relative clause the relative pronoun stands for the name of the object.
---
VI 37/38
Variable/Quine: allows us to manoeuvre every occurrence of "a" into a context of "a =" and to treat the resulting context as an unanalysable predicate "A" that absorbes the singular term - singular term: can be re-introduced later as a description.
---
VII 13
Bound variable/Quine: instead of it, we can say that something is in the range of a pronoun.
---
VII 107ff
Variables/Quine: "F": not bindable - Only apparent predicates, vacancies in the sentence chart - "p", "q", etc. stand for whole expressions, they are sometimes viewed as if they needed entities whose names are these expressions (these are called propositions) - "p" "q", etc. are never bound variables! - "p>q" not a sentence, but a scheme.
---
VII 110
Not bindable variable/Quine: E.g. "p". If it were considered to be the name of some entity, it would have to be a bindable variable, which is not the case - e.g. "F" on a par with "p": if predicates are to be the names of some entity, they would have to be regarded as bindable variables, which they are not.
---
VII 110
Variables/Numbers/Quine: in "x + 3 > 7" "x" should be regarded as a pseudo-number - "x + 3> 7" should be considered a pseudo-sentence or scheme. It cannot be quantified.
---
VII 111
Variables/Quine: Greek letters: completely different status: they occur in a language about language: E.g. (3) (Ea)(f v y) is on a semantically higher level than "x + 3> 7" - (3) is a name of a sentence or expression - Greek letters are standing for sentences here - they are quantifiable - "f": grammatically substantival, occupies the place of names of sentences - "p": grammatically sentential (sentence form): has the place of complete sentences.
---
IX 194f
Universal variable/Systematic ambiguity/Quine: possibly at the expense of adding new and unreduced predicates "T0", "T1", "T2",... that are added to "e", we can get rid of the special, indexed variables in favor of the universal variables x, y.... - in fact, "Tnx" can easily be expressed with help of "e" and the logic: "Ez(x,y e z)" ensures compliance of the type in x and y and vice versa ensures compliance of the type with x and y that xn, yn e J n + 1, that Ez(x,y, e z) - thus disappears Russell’s grammatical constraint, that declared "xm e y n" meaningless if m + 1 unequal n - "m e y n" now becomes useful for all m and n - if m + 1 unequal n, so "xm e y n" simply becomes wrong.
---
X 95
Variables/Quine: quantifiable V should never be in predicate places, but always in name places.

Q I
W.V.O. Quine
Wort und Gegenstand Stuttgart 1980

Q II
W.V.O. Quine
Theorien und Dinge Frankfurt 1985

Q III
W.V.O. Quine
Grundzüge der Logik Frankfurt 1978

Q IX
W.V.O. Quine
Mengenlehre und ihre Logik Wiesbaden 1967

Q V
W.V.O. Quine
Die Wurzeln der Referenz Frankfurt 1989

Q VI
W.V.O. Quine
Unterwegs zur Wahrheit Paderborn 1995

Q VII
W.V.O. Quine
From a logical point of view Cambridge, Mass. 1953

Q VIII
W.V.O. Quine
Bezeichnung und Referenz
In
Zur Philosophie der idealen Sprache, J. Sinnreich (Hg), München 1982

Q X
W.V.O. Quine
Philosophie der Logik Bamberg 2005

Q XII
W.V.O. Quine
Ontologische Relativität Frankfurt 2003


> Counter arguments against Quine



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-27