|Judgment: the use of the concept „judgment“ is not uniform. If the judgment is interpreted as the determination of the truth value ("true" or "false") of a statement, this is indicated explicitly, e.g. with the judgment stroke I- introduced by G. Frege. See also truth value, judgment stroke, sentence, statement, utterance, assertion._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. |
Gottlob Frege on Judgments - Dictionary of Arguments
Judgement: the judgement is the progression from the thoughts to its truth value.
Judgement Line/Frege: the judgement line asserts something. On the other hand: "2 + 3 = 5" is just a truth value written down. With the judgement symbol/line it is said at the same time that the truth value is truth.
Judgment/Frege: e.g. if the accused was in Rome at the time, he could not have committed the crime. One judgement, three thoughts.
It is wrong to believe that a judgement realizes a connection or an order.
Judgement: is a mental process and needs a bearer. Negation/denial: negation does not need a bearer._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik Stuttgart 1987
Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung Göttingen 1994
Logische Untersuchungen Göttingen 1993