|Judgment: the use of the concept „judgment“ is not uniform. If the judgment is interpreted as the determination of the truth value ("true" or "false") of a statement, this is indicated explicitly, e.g. with the judgment stroke I- introduced by G. Frege. See also truth value, judgment stroke, sentence, statement, utterance, assertion._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. |
Books on Amazon
Verdict: progression from thoughts to his truth value.
Judgign stroke/Frege: with it something is asserted . - On the other hand: "2 + 3 = 5" is just a truth value written down - With the verdict symbol it is said at the same time that the truth value is truth.
Judgment / Frege: E.g. If the accused was in Rome at the time, he could not have committed the crime. - One verdict, three thoughts. -
It is wrong to believe that a verdict realizes a connection or an order. -
verdict: mental process. - needs a bearer. Negation / denial: no need of a bearer._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.
Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik Stuttgart 1987
Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung Göttingen 1994
Logische Untersuchungen Göttingen 1993