Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Universals: Universals are expressions for what objects can have in common, such as a particular color. Examples of universals are redness, roundness, value. The ontological status of universals as something independent of thought - that is, their existence - is controversial. What is undisputed is that we form terms to generalize and use them successfully. See also General terms, Generality, Generalization, Ontology, Existence, Conceptual realism, Realism, Ideas, Methexis, Sortals, Conceptualism, Nominalism._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Noam Chomsky on Universals - Dictionary of Arguments
Lyons I 139 Universals/Chomsky/Lyons: 1. Noun universals/Chomsky/Lyons: (not "substantive"): if you introduce a set of distinctive characteristics, of which a subset is combined in different ways in the phonological systems of each language, then the distinctive characteristics are the substantive universals. Cf. >Distinction, >Classification. 2. Formal universals/Chomsky/Lyons: any condition for the mode of action of the phonological rules or combinations of phonological units according to the rules. For example, the postulate of one-dimensionality. VsTradition: the universal categories there can neither be described as formal nor substantial, since the rules of traditional grammar have not been explicitly formalized. I 140 Tradition/Chomsky: was primarily defined by the noun. Formal/Linguistics/Lyons: we use "formal" here only in the sense of not "content-related" and in contrast to "non-formal"._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Chomsky I Noam Chomsky "Linguistics and Philosophy", in: Language and Philosophy, (Ed) Sidney Hook New York 1969 pp. 51-94 In Linguistik und Philosophie, G. Grewendorf/G. Meggle, Frankfurt/M. 1974/1995 Chomsky II Noam Chomsky "Some empirical assumptions in modern philosophy of language" in: Philosophy, Science, and Method, Essays in Honor of E. Nagel (Eds. S. Morgenbesser, P. Suppes and M- White) New York 1969, pp. 260-285 In Linguistik und Philosophie, G. Grewendorf/G. Meggle, Frankfurt/M. 1974/1995 Chomsky IV N. Chomsky Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge/MA 1965 German Edition: Aspekte der Syntaxtheorie Frankfurt 1978 Chomsky V N. Chomsky Language and Mind Cambridge 2006 Ly II John Lyons Semantics Cambridge, MA 1977 Lyons I John Lyons Introduction to Theoretical Lingustics, Cambridge/MA 1968 German Edition: Einführung in die moderne Linguistik München 1995 |
||
> Counter arguments against Chomsky
> Counter arguments in relation to Universals
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-16