Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Elm/Beech example, philosophy: thought experiment of H. Putnam (Putnam, H. Reason, truth and history, Cambridge, 2008). The speaker cannot distinguish elms and beeches, but he knows that both are different trees. What is the status of his knowledge? Putnam draws the conclusion that meanings are not in the head. See also reference, knowledge, causal theory, meaning, thought experiments.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
IV 143
I can know that "elm" and "beech" are separate classes of deciduous trees, but I can have no idea how to differentiate them.
IV 143
Often nothing in the consciousness of the speaker determines the extension of his terms. E.g. I can know that "Feynman" and "Gell-Man" are names of important physicists, but do not know by which the one differs from the other.
My language skills will not be endangered by my ignorance.

N. Goodman
Weisen der Welterzeugung Frankfurt 1984

N. Goodman
Tatsache Fiktion Voraussage Frankfurt 1988

N. Goodman
Sprachen der Kunst Frankfurt 1997

N. Goodman/K. Elgin
Revisionen Frankfurt 1989

> Counter arguments against Goodman

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-29