Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Deletion, language philosophy: here, we are concerned with the possible omission of parts of sentences while maintaining the meaning.

Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 402
Deletion/Conversationalistic H: additional features of e.g. and may in some contexts be deleted - in particular generally made assumptions - Grice: any opponent of KH would have to accept at least two lexicon meanings. - (Non-w-functional theory is always stronger). - Cohen pro: also semant H only one meaning of and. - E.g. bloom strong: excludes plastic flowers - E.g. when a republic is proclaimed, the King is dead and Tom is satisfied: maybe he would already be satisfied if the Republic was proclaimed only.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Gri I
H. Paul Grice
Handlung, Kommunikation, Bedeutung, Hg. Georg Meggle Frankfurt/M. 1993

> Counter arguments against Grice
> Counter arguments in relation to Deletion

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-08-23