Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
I 43/44
"Topic-neutral" (Austin): is not nomological - SearleVsTopic-neutral: Digestion needs not an additional state that would have to be described separately.
---
I 121
Nagel: no theory can show the necessity of the identity of pain and physical condition - SearleVsNagel: that is not necessary anyway, e.g. gravitational theory does not show the necessity of gravitation.

S I
J. R. Searle
Die Wiederentdeckung des Geistes Frankfurt 1996

S II
J.R. Searle
Intentionalität Frankfurt 1991

S III
J. R. Searle
Die Konstruktion der gesellschaftlichen Wirklichkeit Hamburg 1997

S IV
J.R. Searle
Ausdruck und Bedeutung Frankfurt 1982

S V
J. R. Searle
Sprechakte Frankfurt 1983


> Counter arguments against Searle
> Counter arguments in relation to Theories



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-25