Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Terminologies: here, special features of the language use of the individual authors are explained.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
Fodor IV 139
Def Interpretation Theory / Dennett: thesis: beliefs, desires, etc. are not real (ontologically), but only epistemically useful concepts.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Den I
D. Dennett
Darwins gefährliches Erbe Hamburg 1997

Den II
D. Dennett
Spielarten des Geistes Gütersloh 1999

F/L
J. Fodor/E. Lepore
Holism Cambridge USA Oxford UK 1992


> Counter arguments against Dennett



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-08-20