Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
~ passim
TugendhatVsSpeech Act

I 137
TugendhatVsSpeech Acts: unsatisfactory, assumed modes, because they are just like propositional content abstract moments of sentences that we can hardly believe - because they are moments and not components, they are also not independent.
I 239
Speech Act / Austin /Tugendhat: his merit is to have lifted the illocutionary act (meaning, claiming) as an independent, semantically relevant way.

Tu I
E. Tugendhat
Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976

E. Tugendhat
Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992

> Counter arguments against Tugendhat
> Counter arguments in relation to Speech Act Theory

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-24