Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
Avr I 140
BerkeleyVsLocke: no "generalizing forces" - linguistic generalization is no generalization of mind. - Singular names do not have to give rise to the understanding of ideas. - It is not the main purpose of language to evoke ideas - instead: even eliciting of passion discouraging and encouraging of actions, etc.
Breidert I 228ff
Language / Berkeley: philosophical errors are often explained linguistically. - Incorrect projection:the idea of a thing - ambiguity: something or a thing - applicable to ideas or acts of will. - Ideas: ideas of things perceived - notion: concept of a mind and its activities.
G. Berkeley
I Breidert Berkeley: Wahrnnehmung und Wirklichkeit, aus Speck(Hg) Grundprobleme der gr. Philosophen, Göttingen (UTB) 1997
Ber I
W. Breidert
Grundprobleme der großen Philosophen, J. Speck (Hg), Göttingen 1997

> Counter arguments against Berkeley
> Counter arguments in relation to Language

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-24