Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 297
Brandom's thesis understanding the semantics based on the pragmatics.
II 145
Semantic theory/BrandomVsDretske/VsMillikan/VsFodor: Problem: Cannot explain how real representations (beliefs) differ from simple indicator states (>RDRDs, reliable differential responsive dispositions).
II 146
Reliability theory/Brandom: cannot be applied to the semantics ((s) otherwise circular?) - epistemology is its suitable working area.
Newen/Schrenk I 161
Brandom/Newen/Schrenk: reverses the conventional semantics - justifying "the correctness of e.g. if A is located east of B, B is located west of A" - by the meaning of - west - and - east -".
I 162
West and east acquire their meaning precisely because they occur in such inferences - " basic concepts: not truth and reference (Tarski s truth concept too weak) - "correctness: from social practice - "Meaning: arises from the inferential roles.

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begr√ľnden und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001

> Counter arguments against Brandom
> Counter arguments in relation to Semantics

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-24