Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
HC I 39
S4/Hughes/Cresswell: T + Np> NNP - (weaker) - S5: T + M> NMP (stronger) - both are stronger than T -
HC I 110
S4/Hughes/Cresswell: = T + (Lp> LLp) - (s) what is necessary is necessary for logical reasons- stronger than T, weaker than S5 - S5: T + (Mp> LMp). - ((S) what is possible, is necessarily possible.)
HC I 69
Semantics / semantic models / Hughes / Cresswell: (E.g. T, S4, S5) alone are insufficient to characterize the different meanings of necessity and possibility -> semantic graphs / Hughes / Cresswell: consider various worlds.

Cr I
M. J. Cresswell
Semantical Essays (Possible worlds and their rivals) Dordrecht Boston 1988

Cr II
M. J. Cresswell
Structured Meanings Cambridge Mass. 1984


> Counter arguments against Cresswell



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-23