Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
Rorty VI 167
Representation / Dennett: how consensus can be explained by success: e.g. a map representing shoals, is simply better than one that does not.
RortyVsDennett: e.g. electron: we are not able to go back and forth between what we say about electrons and the electrons themselves. And not between our attributions of beliefs and the beliefs themselves! E.g. (Wittgenstein) That would be like trying to verify what s in the paper by looking up what is in another copy of the same newspaper.

Den I
D. Dennett
Darwins gefährliches Erbe Hamburg 1997

Den II
D. Dennett
Spielarten des Geistes Gütersloh 1999

Ro I
R. Rorty
Der Spiegel der Natur Frankfurt 1997

R. Rorty
Philosophie & die Zukunft Frankfurt 2000

R. Rorty
Kontingenz, Ironie und Solidarität Frankfurt 1992

R. Rorty
Eine Kultur ohne Zentrum Stuttgart 1993

Ro V
R. Rorty
Solidarität oder Objektivität? Stuttgart 1998

R. Rorty
Wahrheit und Fortschritt Frankfurt 2000

> Counter arguments against Dennett
> Counter arguments in relation to Representation

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-24