Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Relations, philosophy: relations are that what can be discovered or produced in objects or states when compared to other objects or other states with regard to a selected property. For example, dimensional differences between objects A and B, which are placed into a linguistic order with the expression "larger" or "smaller" as a link, are determinations of relations which exist between the objects. Identity or equality is not accepted as a relation by most authors. See also space, time, order, categories, reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity.

Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 177 ~
Relation/Esfeld: does not need a non-relational explanation reason (unlike dispositions that need a non-dispositional explanation reason)).
I 298 ~
External relations/Lewis: e.g. Suppose "equal charge"/"unequal charge" (external) instead of positive/negative (intrinsic): equal charge/unequal charge do not supervenience on positive/negative. - equal charge/unequal charge no distinguishing properties. - For example, if there are three spheres that can have two different colors, at least two must be the same: so there are external relations that are spatiotemporal - (> entanglement, Quantum Mechanics) - external relation: Condition: a) must not supervenience on non-relational properties (E.g. mass), b) must supervenience on the nature of the composite.
I 299 ~
Relations: independent of state: two things always in a space-time relation - entanglement: state-dependent, whether two things are intertwined: therefore questionable whether external relation, no question of the nature of the terms.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Es I
M. Esfeld
Holismus Frankfurt/M 2002

> Counter arguments against Esfeld
> Counter arguments in relation to Relations

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-29