Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Regress, philosophy of science: also infinite regress. This is an expression for the problem that, in the case of certain formulations of definitions or problem solving, elements are used which were already used for the questions and which are actually to be examined first. Formally, regress is the insertion of expressions in repetitive linguistic or logical forms, which in turn lead to repetitions. See also circularity, definition, definability, theories.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
275F II
Regress / evidence/ relation / Nozick: the regress that we need a proof that something is an evidence is stopped when a document has a dual power - a) as evidence of something - b) for the fact that it is an evidence for something. - In other words, that it is evidence for two contingent statements - a particular one and a more general document about the relationship - logical form:e.g. eRh and also e R (eRh) and it is also the case that e R [e R (eRh)] then we have no regress - if it is the same evidence e the regress is stopped before: if eR (eRh).


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

No I
R. Nozick
Philosophical Explanations Oxford 1981

No II
R., Nozick
The Nature of Rationality 1994


> Counter arguments against Nozick
> Counter arguments in relation to Regress



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-07-22