|Radical interpretation, philosophy: is an expression for a family of thought experiments, which has the object of the translation of a completely foreign language into the language of the interpreter, which the interpreter does not understand at all. See also translation, indeterminacy, Gavagai._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. |
radical interpretation/ RI / r.i./Davidson / Avramides: going on gradually, but from the beginning one needs assumptions about beliefs and about the meaning of utterances.
RI / asymmetry / Avramides: from the perspective of radical interpretation, there is no asymmetry between the psychological and the semantic side.
Grice / Avramides: trying to understand meaning ((s) the concept of meaning) - RI: trying to understand speaker (communication) - Grice initially not interested in the realization of communication.
RI / Avramides: from her point of view there is an epistemic symmetry between the semantic and the psychological - unlike Grice s theory of meaning_____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
Meaning and Mind Boston 1989