Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

 
Quasi-Quotation, philosophy: is an expression for the form in which the citing of statements or parts of statements has to be done, which themselves contain variables. (See W.V.O. Quine, 1961, §6). Since different things can be inserted instead of these variables, the reference has to be established first or the missing reference must be indicated. Filling in formula data can be understood similarly. For example, one is not asked to write "date of birth", but to note down a value in the place [date of birth]. See also mentioning, use.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
I 960
Quasi-quotation marks/Quine/Brandom: convenient expression for generalizations that contain quotes: [p] is supposed to be a variable for the results of the use of quotation marks in the sentences about which the variable is: reversed order of operation as with the ordinary quotation marks: here, p is a quote name of a letter of the alphabet.
---
I 591
E.g. if [a] and [b] are terms that denote straight lines, then new terms [direction of a] and [direction of b] can be defined based on the equivalence relation... is parallel to-> Geach I 206.
---
I 742
Quasi-quote/quasi-quotation marks/Brandom: the recognition of the definition that says the attribution of Johanna that [p] (square brackets quasi- quote) attributes to Johanna that assertive definition that would recognize Johanna if she asserted a Tokening of the same sentence p - that is, of the same lexical-syntactic type.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begründen und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001


> Counter arguments against Brandom

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-09-24