Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Private language: according to L. Wittgenstein a private language, i.e. a language which an individual develops only for himself and uses to express his feelings, is not possible. (See L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, 1953, ยง 243, 258). You cannot give yourself instructions. You could not even understand the language. See also rule following, Kripke's Wittgenstein, priviledged access, Wittgenstein's beetle.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
Re III 275 (St. Read, Philosophie der Logik, Hamburg 1997, German)
Wittgenstein: a private language would require private, incommunicable rules. Private attempts to obey these rules would not distinguish between correct behavior and breaking the rules. Everything that appeared correct to the private linguist , would be correct. As a result, there can be no aspect of the significance that is not publicly manifestable.
Logic Texts
Me I Albert Menne Folgerichtig Denken Darmstadt 1988
HH II Hoyningen-Huene Formale Logik, Stuttgart 1998
Re III Stephen Read Philosophie der Logik Hamburg 1997
Sal IV Wesley C. Salmon Logik Stuttgart 1983
Sai V R.M.Sainsbury Paradoxien Stuttgart 2001


> Counter arguments in relation to Private Language



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-30