Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

 
Predicates, philosophy, logic: predicates are symbols that can stand in logical formulas for properties. In fact, not every predicate stands for a property, since it has contradictory predicates, but no contradictory properties. For example, one can think of a predicate "squaround" for "square and round", that is, two properties that exclude each other. One can then truthfully say "Nothing is squaround". There are therefore more predicates than properties. See also round square, scheme characters, quantification, 2nd level logic, predication, attributes, adjectives.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
I 110
Predicate/Geach: "predicables": spurious: E.g. "--- smoked a pipe" -"5 is dividable by 5 and by one", as well as for "3..." - predicate: real: "Russell smoked a pipe" - the identity of predicates with reflexive pronouns is not assured.
---
I 216
Predicate/Geach: must never be confused with names - the term does not denote the object.
---
I 224
Predicates/Geach: more common property of sentences - but not actual expression in the sentence.
---
I 224
"Stand for"/Geach: there is no difference whether I say a predicate "stands for" a property or it is its name.
---
I 224
Predicate/Geach: does not appear as an actual expression in the sentence. - Geach: there is no identity criterion for predicates. - One cannot know whether two predicates stand for the same property. - Equality of use is necessary condition for same reference. - ((s) That is, the extension but not the intension is equal!) - GeachVsQuine: therefore one should not identify properties with classes.
---
I 239
Predicate/Terminology/Geach: I call predicates only like this if they are used as the principal functor in a proposition, otherwise "predicables". -
I-predicables/I-predicate/Geach: (s): those predicates in which regard the two objects are indistinguishable in a given theory - if distinctions can be made in an extended theory, then the l-predicate does not change its meaning - E.g. "uniform" for (different but not at all differentiated) tokens of words, later the tokens are distinguished, but are still "uniform".
---
I 301
GeachVs two-name theory: error: that if two names denote the same thing, that they then allow the same predicates.
---
I 301
Predicate/Geach: Predicates such as "become" can only be assigned to concrete terms.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Gea I
P.T. Geach
Logic Matters Oxford 1972


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Geach

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-09-26