Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Author Item Summary Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
II 2
Philosophy / Nozick: I refuse to follow a thought, to wherever it leads - no argument forces us to accept unwanted conclusions - the conclusion should not be known in advance - we should not start from basic principles (axioms). -
  II 8
explanation/Nozick: in contrast to this: is not based on arguments.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

No I
R. Nozick
Philosophical Explanations Oxford 1981

No II
R., Nozick
The Nature of Rationality 1994


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Nozick
> Counter arguments in relation to Philosophy

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-10-17