Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Paradoxes: are contradictions within formally correct statements or sets of statements that lead to an existence assumption, which initially seemed plausible, to be withdrawn. Paradoxes are not errors, but challenges that may lead to a re-formulation of the prerequisites and assumptions, or to a change in the language, the subject domain, and the logical system. See also Russellian paradox, contradictions, range, consistency.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
Horwich I 114
Liar/Paradox/Tarski: arises when we assume that the language contains the names of the expressions, and semantic terms such as "true" - then the language is Def - "semantically closed". - I 115 Such languages ​​can be eliminated even in the sciences, in which semantic terms are essential.

Tarsk I
A. Tarski
Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923-38 Indianapolis 1983

Hor I
P. Horwich (Ed.)
Theories of Truth Aldershot 1994


> Counter arguments against Tarski
> Counter arguments in relation to Paradoxes



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-23