Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Operators, logic: operators are symbols for performing a function, e.g. and; or; if; then; etc.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Summary Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
I 150
Operator/law/Truth function/Fodor: it is a law, defines a non-truth-functional context - (or not all the truth functions of natural-kind predicates are themselves natural-kind predicates) - e.g. the inference from a premise of the form (P comprises R) and (Q comprises S) to a conclusion of the form (P v Q) comprising (R v S) is valid! - No nat-kind predicate: E.g. -is either friction or sunlight - because there is no law by friction or by sunlight either heat or photosynthesis are produced - even if the individual disjuncts are laws. - Nevertheless: liberal reductionism: amounts to a bracketing of individual disjunctions. - Bridge statements: must be laws - from truth-functions follow no natural kinds. - E.g. bumble bee or bat.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

F/L
J. Fodor/E. Lepore
Holism Cambridge USA Oxford UK 1992


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Fodor

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-11-18