Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Ontological Commitment: A theory is bound to the acceptance of objects if it were wrong without the existence of these objects. It may be, however, that parts of the theory do not have to contain the object, then the ontological commitment for the whole theory is omitted. (See H. Lauener Quine, 1982, p. 130).
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
I 151
ontological commitment / Quine / Field: belongs to the sentences that the speaker accepts in the strict sense -> acceptance.
III IX
Ontological Commitment / Field: can be scaled down by extending the logic.

Fie I
H. Field
Realism, Mathematics and Modality Oxford New York 1989

Fie II
H. Field
Truth and the Absence of Fact Oxford New York 2001

Fie III
H. Field
Science without numbers Princeton New Jersey 1980


> Counter arguments against Field
> Counter arguments in relation to Ontological Commitment



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-30