Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments
| |||
|
| |||
| Ontology: is the set of material or immaterial objects, of which a theory assumes that it can make statements about them. According to classical logic, an existence assumption must be assumed. In other fields of knowledge, the question of whether relations really exist or are merely mental constructs, is not always regarded as decisive as long as one can work with them. Immaterial objects are e.g. linguistic structures in linguistics. See also existence, mathematical entities, theoretical entities, theoretical terms, reality, metaphysics, semantic web._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Item | Summary | Meta data |
|---|---|---|---|
| I 40 Ontology/Searle: wrong question: what kinds of things are there in the world? correct: what must be the case that our empiricism is true? --- Stalnaker I 181 Ontology/language/metaphysics/Searle: one may not draw ontological conclusions from linguistic theories._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. |
S I J. R. Searle Die Wiederentdeckung des Geistes Frankfurt 1996 S II J.R. Searle Intentionalität Frankfurt 1991 S III J. R. Searle Die Konstruktion der gesellschaftlichen Wirklichkeit Hamburg 1997 S IV J.R. Searle Ausdruck und Bedeutung Frankfurt 1982 S V J. R. Searle Sprechakte Frankfurt 1983 Sta I R. Stalnaker Ways a World may be Oxford New York 2003 |
||
> Counter arguments against Searle
> Counter arguments in relation to Ontology ...
> Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2018-06-21