Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Modal logic: the modal logic is an extension of classical logic to systems in which possibility and necessity can also be expressed. Different approaches use operators to express "necessary" and "possible", which, depending on the placement within formulas, can let claims of different strengths win. E.g. there is an object which necessarily has the property F/it is necessary that there is an object with the property F. The introduction of possible worlds makes quantification possible for expressing possibility (There is at least one world in which ...) and necessity (For all worlds is valid ...). See also operators, quantifier, completion, range, possible worlds.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
~ I 249
Modal logic /(s): from possibility follows nothing? Field: E.g. when a mixed statement (*) folows from a purely physical statement (**) plus mathematics, it does not follow from (*) plus "possible mathematics" -

Fie I
H. Field
Realism, Mathematics and Modality Oxford New York 1989

Fie II
H. Field
Truth and the Absence of Fact Oxford New York 2001

H. Field
Science without numbers Princeton New Jersey 1980

> Counter arguments against Field
> Counter arguments in relation to Modal Logic

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-30