Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Metalanguage: metalanguage is the language in which linguistic forms, the meaning of expressions and sentences, the use of language, as well as the admissibility of formations, and the truth of statements are discussed. The language you refer to is called object language. A statement about the form, correctness, or truth of another statement thus includes both, i.e. object language and meta language. See also richness, truth-predicate, expressiveness, paradoxes, mention, use, quasi-reference, quotation, hierarchy, fixed points.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 103
Meta language / Prior: Problem: "I say something wrong" cannot be the only thing I say - then a meta language is necessary, otherwise follows an absurdity: I could choose a short time interval in which I could say nothing else - also: the language in which the theorems are expressed, can not be the same as the language used in some other opportunities to do so -a hierarchy is possible without meta language : e.g. "N": "something that Prior says between t and t is not the case": then: N is a true sentence if and only if ... something is not the case - ((s) without quotation marks) - e.g. VsMeta language. "I’ll be damned if grass is pink."- ((s) quasi-"operator") - Prior: "isolation" through "I’ll be" - solution: meta-part of the language (isolated), no complete meta language.

Pri I
A. Prior
Objects of thought Oxford 1971

Pri II
Arthur N. Prior
Papers on Time and Tense 2nd Edition Oxford 2003

> Counter arguments against Prior
> Counter arguments in relation to Metalanguage

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-24