Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Logic: logic is the doctrine of the admissibility or inadmissibility of relations between statements and thus the validity of the compositions of these statements. In particular, the question is whether conclusions can be obtained from certain presuppositions such as premises or antecedents. Logical formulas are not interpreted at first. Only the interpretation, i. e. the insertion of values, e.g. objects instead of the free variables, makes the question of their truth meaningful.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
Brandom I 494
Logic/Dummett: per wide view: the derivability relation is decisive, not theorems. - Validity is based on antecedent sets of multi-values. ​​- I.e., synthetic, not analytic application of the apparatus. - Not informal assertional validity but formal inferential validity.
I 495
Brandom: per extension to material inferences.

Du I
M. Dummett
Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie Frankfurt 1992

Du III
M. Dummett
Wahrheit Stuttgart 1982

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begründen und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001


> Counter arguments against Dummett
> Counter arguments in relation to Logic



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-25