Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
II 104
Induction / ArmstrongVsMartin / VsPlace: as nominalists they can not accept an atomic higher level state, connecting the universals.
II 107
Linguisticism / Place: Armstrong and Martin insinuate me to be too extreme - solution: to accept that the objects of desire and those which are joined by conterf.cond., do not exist and may never exist - problem: that the quantification is not allowed over non-existent objects - an intensional quantifier is not yet developed - II 106 Place: "I want an apple, i do not want a sentence to be true".

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

AR II = Disp
D. M. Armstrong

Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996

D. Armstrong
What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge 1983

> Counter arguments against Armstrong
> Counter arguments in relation to Linguisticism

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-08-17