Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
II 104
Induction / ArmstrongVsMartin / VsPlace: as nominalists they can not accept an atomic higher level state, connecting the universals.
II 107
Linguisticism / Place: Armstrong and Martin insinuate me to be too extreme - solution: to accept that the objects of desire and those which are joined by conterf.cond., do not exist and may never exist - problem: that the quantification is not allowed over non-existent objects - an intensional quantifier is not yet developed - II 106 Place: "I want an apple, i do not want a sentence to be true".

AR II = Disp
D. M. Armstrong

In
Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996

AR III
D. Armstrong
What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge 1983


> Counter arguments against Armstrong
> Counter arguments in relation to Linguisticism



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-26