Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments | |||
| Author | Item | Excerpt | Meta data |
|---|---|---|---|
Books on Amazon |
III 122 Forces / Ontology / Armstrong: forces would be non-categorical universals along with categorical and particulars - too complex ontology - ((s) "non-categorical" because of the bearer?) - Armstrong: also you still need relations - also a relation between force and its actualization - ArmstrongVs forces II 152 Force / ArmstrongVsForce/Armstrong: Forces point "behind themselves"._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. |
AR II = Disp D. M. Armstrong In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 AR III D. Armstrong What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge 1983 |
|
> Counter arguments against Armstrong
> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-25