Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
III 122
Forces / Ontology / Armstrong: forces would be non-categorical universals along with categorical and particulars - too complex ontology - ((s) "non-categorical" because of the bearer?) - Armstrong: also you still need relations - also a relation between force and its actualization - ArmstrongVs forces
II 152
Force / ArmstrongVsForce/Armstrong: Forces point "behind themselves".

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

AR II = Disp
D. M. Armstrong

Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996

D. Armstrong
What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge 1983

> Counter arguments against Armstrong

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-08-20