|Def: truth as correspondence with objects in the world. See also mapping relation, representation._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. |
Books on Amazon
Correspondence Theory/Truth/Field: needs an additional concept of the truth theoretical content of psychological states. - And it is used in a way that it cannot occur in the disquotation scheme.
Correspondence Theory/FieldVsCorrespondence Theory: even for an inconsistent theory it is consistent when the the correspondence theory is assumed that it is true, because the logical words in it could have been used differently. - Therefore, the truth of the correspondence theory should not be applied to disquotational truth, because it is a logical concept itself and the instances of disquotation scheme must be regarded as logical truths.
Correspondence Theory/Ontological Commitment/O.C./Quine/Field: the ontological commitment seems to exclude the correspondence theory. - FieldVsQuine: despite the uncertainty we should allow correspondence. - >partial denotation.
Horwich I 416
VsCorrespondence: which one is the right one? - Field: which one is relevant may depend on epistemic values, but not on which values are "correct." - Field pro "epistemic relativism".
RelativismVsSkepticism: the question of the "real" justification does not make sense._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.
Realism, Mathematics and Modality Oxford New York 1989
Truth and the Absence of Fact Oxford New York 2001
Science without numbers Princeton New Jersey 1980
P. Horwich (Ed.)
Theories of Truth Aldershot 1994