Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

 
Theory of neural networks as an explanation for mind states.:

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
I 128 ff - 145
Neural Networks/Pinker: Learning/Problem: Incorrect reinforcement with "xor" (Shefferstrich) - Solution: interpose internal representation - ...+... -
---
I 142
Rumelhart: return all errors - "hidden levels": several statements that can be true or wrong can be assembled into a complex logical function, the values ​​then vary continuously - System can place the correct emphasis itself if input and output are given - as long as similar inputs lead to similar outputs, no additional training is required ->Homunculi.
---
I 144f
Connectionism/Rumelhart: mind large neural network - rats have only fewer nets - PinkerVsConnectionism: networks alone are not sufficient for handling symbols - the networks have to be structured in programs - even past tense overstretches a network - precursor: "association of ideas": Locke/Hume/Berkeley/Hartley/Mill - 1) contiguity (context): frequently experienced ideas are associated in the mind - 2) similarity: similar ideas activate each other.
---
I 146
Computer variant: is a statistical calculations with multiple levels.
---
I 147
VsConnectionism: units with the same representations are indistinguishable - individual should not be construed as the smallest subclass.
---
I 151
Cannot explain compositionality of representation.
---
I 158 ~
Recursion/Recursive/Neural Networks/Memory/Pinker: recursion solution for the problem of an infinite number of possible thoughts: Separation of short/long-term memory - the whole sentence is not comprehended at once, but words are processed individually in loops.
---
I 159
Networks themselves have to been as recursive processor: for thoughts to be well-formed.
---
I 166
Neural Networks/Pinker: the networks do not reach down to the rules - they only interpolate between examples that have been put in.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Pi I
St. Pinker
Wie das Denken im Kopf entsteht München 1998


> Counter arguments against Pinker
> Counter arguments in relation to Connectionism

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-09-26