Dictionary of Arguments

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Author Item Summary Meta data
I 296
and / sign / mention / use / Tugendhat: "A and B": on the side of the sign, we do not have to expect the term "p and q" , but the expression ’that p and that q". This is an analogy, in fact. Moreover it is in need of a completion by a predicate - I 297
but the state of affairs that p and the st.o.a. that q are not composed - we need a more general term, that somehow contains composition, but goes beyond it.
I 297
Conjunction / Tugendhat: "and" not connecting objects nor states of affairs - it combines nothing at all.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.
The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.

Tu I
E. Tugendhat
Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976

Tu II
E. Tugendhat
Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Tugendhat

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2019-05-19
Legal Notice   Contact   Data protection declaration