Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 296
and / sign / mention / use / Tugendhat: "A and B": on the side of the sign, we do not have to expect the term "p and q" , but the expression ’that p and that q". This is an analogy, in fact. Moreover it is in need of a completion by a predicate - I 297
but the state of affairs that p and the st.o.a. that q are not composed - we need a more general term, that somehow contains composition, but goes beyond it.
I 297
Conjunction / Tugendhat: "and" not connecting objects nor states of affairs - it combines nothing at all.

Tu I
E. Tugendhat
Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976

E. Tugendhat
Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992

> Counter arguments against Tugendhat

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-27