Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
II 101
  Causal law / Armstrong: In the simplest case, the following entailment: Cause * (F, G) Entails (x) (Fx> cause ([Fx], [Gx])) - "F-ness causes G-ness implies that for all Fs if something is an F, it causes that the same thing is G" - the entailment is not from right to left - right: mere bundle of individual causes

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

AR II = Disp
D. M. Armstrong

Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996

D. Armstrong
What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge 1983

> Counter arguments against Armstrong
> Counter arguments in relation to Causal Laws

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-07-28