Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Categories: categories are basic concepts for classifying the objects of a knowledge domain into different groups or hierarchies. In philosophy, the category systems of different authors can differ considerably. Concepts which are not suitable for classifying are transcendentals, e.g. the concept of similarity. However, these concepts are again applicable to categorized objects.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 13ff
Category Confusion/Ryle: counting elements in the same category as the set:
I 35 f
Reasonable Actions: not origin but design distinguished - conscious act: not two actions - Physical/Mental: two descriptions of the same
I 37/38
Habit of talking loudly is not loud itself
I 46
Feeling "in the head": I do not feel the rolling of the ship in the head, but in the legs
I 49
Ability: not reciting rules, but applying them - not event word but modal word - disposition, no second action beside the first
I 162f
Law - Error/Ryle: confusing hypothetical generalizations with categorical individual judgments - E.g. ticket entitles to a ride, it is not the ride itself - laws authority to inference, not the inference itself - (facts: stations)

Ry I
G. Ryle
Der Begriff des Geistes Stuttgart 1969

> Counter arguments against Ryle
> Counter arguments in relation to Categories

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-23