Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Categories: categories are basic concepts for classifying the objects of a knowledge domain into different groups or hierarchies. In philosophy, the category systems of different authors can differ considerably. Concepts which are not suitable for classifying are transcendentals, e.g. the concept of similarity. However, these concepts are again applicable to categorized objects.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
IV 250
Category/Linguistics/spelling/terminology/Lewis: an S/N (see above General Semantics) is something that forms a sentence together with a name. That means it is an intransitive verb - E.g. transitive verb: (S/N)/N takes a name to form an intransitive verb. - E.g. (S/S)/S two-digit connection or operator: takes a sentence in order to form something that can be combined with a sentence in turn to form a sentence. - Intension: an X/Y has no extension. Its intension is a function of appropriate intentions for elements of Category Y on appropriate intensions for elements of the category X.

D. Lewis
Die Identität von Körper und Geist Frankfurt 1989

D. Lewis
Konventionen Berlin 1975

D. Lewis
Philosophical Papers Bd I New York Oxford 1983

D. Lewis
Philosophical Papers Bd II New York Oxford 1986

LwCl I
Cl. I. Lewis
Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge (Dover Books on Western Philosophy) 1991

> Counter arguments against Lewis
> Counter arguments in relation to Categories

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-27