Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 39ff
... These examples still have a feature of intentionality, because a deception is not a case in which you can hear or see something without hearing or seeing anything. But we cannot say that in this case the object belongs to the subject.
I 137 ff esp. I 148
Error: There might actually remain a permanent, unclarified misunderstanding, but it could come to light when we pursue the discussion topic for long enough. Thus this illustration is saved from the psychologistic error that each speaker could only know for himself what he means anyway. (>meaning) .

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Du I
M. Dummett
Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie Frankfurt 1992

M. Dummett
Wahrheit Stuttgart 1982

> Counter arguments against Dummett

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-08-22