Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Interpretation: A) making statements about other statements, whereby the new statements of the vocabulary make use of the original statements and possibly introduce new vocabulary. If no new vocabulary is introduced, new information can be obtained by changing the syntactic elements.
B) In logic, the insertion of values (objects) instead of the constants or free variables.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
EMD II 168
interpreted language/Peacocke: T-scheme T (s) ↔ p - plus satisfaction relation "sats" (even uninterpreted) between series of objects and sentences.
II 171
Variant: an ordered pair whose first component is an interpreted language in the sense of the previous section and whose second component is a function of sentences of the first components to propositional attitudes - then the listener takes the statement as a prima facie evidence (> prima facie).

Pea I
Chr. R. Peacocke
Sense and Content Oxford 1983

EMD II
G. Evans/J. McDowell
Truth and Meaning Oxford 1977

Ev I
G. Evans
The Varieties of Reference (Clarendon Paperbacks) Oxford 1989


> Counter arguments against Peacocke
> Counter arguments in relation to Interpretation



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-23