|Intensions: intensions are reference objects resulting from a linguistic description, in contrast to the material objects (extensions) that may differ therefrom, whether due to inaccuracies, or by the use of indexical expressions. Examples of intensions are “the oldest person in the room”, “the winner”, “John's favorite quote”, “the one who violates the speed limit”. See also morning star/evening star, extensionality, extension._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. |
Intension / extension / Stechow: an expression has various extensions in different situations / worlds , but always the same intension - "Def Int (A) = [[a]] - ((s) intension of an expression = its meaning - Def Ext (a) = Int (a) (s) = [[a]] (s): the extension is the intension in a situation - Def Int (a) = ls.Exts (a) = [[a]] (abstraction)._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
|A. von Stechow
I Arnim von Stechow Schritte zur Satzsemantik