Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Incommensurability: non-comparability. Expression by Thomas Kuhn (Th. Kuhn, The structure of scientific revolutions, 1962). Kuhn argues that scientific theories which are replaced in the course of time use terms which are altered in their meaning, and therefore make a comparison of, e.g. measurement results impossible and thus also a comparison of statements.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon:
Richard Rorty
IV 20 f
Kuhn / Rorty: 1. Different scientific vocabularies can not be translated - but they can be learned. - 2. i.e. you can not argue in a vocabulary against the other - 3. So both have to be considered true. - 4. beliefs are made true by the world. - 5. The beliefs of Aristotle and Galileo cannot be made true by the same world - therefore there must be several possible worlds.

Ro I
R. Rorty
Der Spiegel der Natur Frankfurt 1997

R. Rorty
Philosophie & die Zukunft Frankfurt 2000

R. Rorty
Kontingenz, Ironie und Solidarität Frankfurt 1992

R. Rorty
Eine Kultur ohne Zentrum Stuttgart 1993

Ro V
R. Rorty
Solidarität oder Objektivität? Stuttgart 1998

R. Rorty
Wahrheit und Fortschritt Frankfurt 2000

> Counter arguments against Rorty
> Counter arguments in relation to Incommensurability

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-29